<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: getting over the &#8220;ewwwww!&#8221; factor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://positdesign.com/2009/09/getting-over-the-ewwwww-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://positdesign.com/2009/09/getting-over-the-ewwwww-factor/</link>
	<description>the online home of christine bower</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediumcrazy</title>
		<link>http://positdesign.com/2009/09/getting-over-the-ewwwww-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>mediumcrazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positdesign.com/2009/?p=1616#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Oh I am with you there. NEVER UNDERESTIMATE PEGGY OLSEN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I am with you there. NEVER UNDERESTIMATE PEGGY OLSEN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://positdesign.com/2009/09/getting-over-the-ewwwww-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positdesign.com/2009/?p=1616#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying he&#039;s a good by any stretch character. Those don&#039;t exist in this universe. His motivations were obviously smarmy and tacky, and a little bit  disturbing (I&#039;m sure he thinks he&#039;s got one over on Don now, somehow, etc).

I&#039;m just saying that Peggy can handle him. And she&#039;s probably got more leverage over him than he over her. And, now that I&#039;ve had time to play catch-up on my usual post-MM readings, it looks like the gals at feministing agree with me on this one: http://www.feministing.com/archives/018012.html

They even go a step further, and cast aspersions on people who believe that savvy Peggy could be seduced by Duck&#039;s weak game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying he&#8217;s a good by any stretch character. Those don&#8217;t exist in this universe. His motivations were obviously smarmy and tacky, and a little bit  disturbing (I&#8217;m sure he thinks he&#8217;s got one over on Don now, somehow, etc).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just saying that Peggy can handle him. And she&#8217;s probably got more leverage over him than he over her. And, now that I&#8217;ve had time to play catch-up on my usual post-MM readings, it looks like the gals at feministing agree with me on this one: <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/018012.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.feministing.com/archives/018012.html</a></p>
<p>They even go a step further, and cast aspersions on people who believe that savvy Peggy could be seduced by Duck&#8217;s weak game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediumcrazy</title>
		<link>http://positdesign.com/2009/09/getting-over-the-ewwwww-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>mediumcrazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positdesign.com/2009/?p=1616#comment-119</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve very persuasive. But I still feel that Duck has been portrayed as kind of a smarmy character and I tend to trust those impressions on this show. But you never know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve very persuasive. But I still feel that Duck has been portrayed as kind of a smarmy character and I tend to trust those impressions on this show. But you never know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

